jonty_11
07-19 05:09 PM
please post articles in News Article thread..
wallpaper sony ericsson xperia x10 mini
dassumi
10-08 03:25 PM
I am one of those unfortunate guys who missed the July 2007 boat.
Is there any chance of the priority date getting current again (soon) like in July 2007 even for a month?
What do you guys think??
You have not given any details on your current status - EB2 or EB3 - PD etc.
Is there any chance of the priority date getting current again (soon) like in July 2007 even for a month?
What do you guys think??
You have not given any details on your current status - EB2 or EB3 - PD etc.
wc_user
11-15 10:53 PM
My Title is different in H1-B and GC, though it is in the same field.. I am going for stamping to Chennai in January.. Will this be a problem ? Will they ask questions about I-485 filing in H1-B stamping ?
2011 x10 mini live wallpaper,
natrajs
08-16 03:41 PM
Folks on Main Issues
There is no way we can calculate the total application numbers until unless USCIS comes out with the Details
Let us focus on how to make USCIS to speed up the process and increase number of visa's available
There is no way we can calculate the total application numbers until unless USCIS comes out with the Details
Let us focus on how to make USCIS to speed up the process and increase number of visa's available
more...
Geni
05-31 09:56 PM
Hi,
My labor was denied first time through PERM(December 2005) and later after refiling, it got approve through PERM ( Applied on May 2006)
Now Can I use my first labor filing date as the priority date(Decmber 2005) or they will take the new date(May 2006).
I have I-140 Approved.
Thank you,
:confused:
My labor was denied first time through PERM(December 2005) and later after refiling, it got approve through PERM ( Applied on May 2006)
Now Can I use my first labor filing date as the priority date(Decmber 2005) or they will take the new date(May 2006).
I have I-140 Approved.
Thank you,
:confused:
![Wallpapers For X10 Mini. [WAL] Wallpaper for Xperia](http://img3.imagebanana.com/img/mfsyy49e/preview.jpg "[WAL] Wallpaper for Xperia")
msadiqali
08-31 11:09 AM
rfe for me was to give new job offer letter.
i submitted one two years back. now they had asked for the same thing again,
i submitted one two years back. now they had asked for the same thing again,
more...
jimusa
03-07 09:04 PM
Hi,
I am being told by my employer that Prevailing wage applies for the hours from the start of an employment to the end of the year irrespective of any vacations.
I joined my current company in Feb 2010 and went to India for 1.5 months in Oct-Nov and came back, My prevailing wage hours is calculated from Feb 2010 till the end of the year ignoring the break I took when in India. So, even if I am paid for only the hours I worked here, I have to match the Prevailing wages based upon the hrs from Feb 10 till Dec end 2010.
They want me to pay them the difference as I had a low billing rate and my total earning is lower than the prevailing wage based upon this calculation.
I don't see sufficient information on the web for this clause.
Please help.
Thanks
Jimmy
I am being told by my employer that Prevailing wage applies for the hours from the start of an employment to the end of the year irrespective of any vacations.
I joined my current company in Feb 2010 and went to India for 1.5 months in Oct-Nov and came back, My prevailing wage hours is calculated from Feb 2010 till the end of the year ignoring the break I took when in India. So, even if I am paid for only the hours I worked here, I have to match the Prevailing wages based upon the hrs from Feb 10 till Dec end 2010.
They want me to pay them the difference as I had a low billing rate and my total earning is lower than the prevailing wage based upon this calculation.
I don't see sufficient information on the web for this clause.
Please help.
Thanks
Jimmy
2010 XPERIA X10 Mini Pro
va_labor2002
07-06 02:40 PM
Mr.Douglas Montero is a New York Post Reporter. He has published article on immigration matters earlier. He may listen to legal immigration issues.
Douglas Montero's email Id : douglas.montero@nypost.com
If everybody sends an email to him,he may address our issues and publish an article about legal immigration in the Post !
Let's try !
Douglas Montero's email Id : douglas.montero@nypost.com
If everybody sends an email to him,he may address our issues and publish an article about legal immigration in the Post !
Let's try !
more...
ameryki
10-15 11:22 PM
Wife need to go to India for emergency. Advance Parole expired. Can she already leave while I apply AP now ? Or does she have to be in country until we get it ? Can i apply now and send it to her once i get it here ?
How much time normally it takes if we apply now ?
she has to be in country until she gets it
How much time normally it takes if we apply now ?
she has to be in country until she gets it
hair Xperia X10 Mini Pro and Nexus
dkann
09-17 10:16 AM
Hi,
I got my H-1b(6th year extension) approved from VSC, within a week, using premium processing. My 140 is pending. So, I got approval for only one year.
I got my H-1b(6th year extension) approved from VSC, within a week, using premium processing. My 140 is pending. So, I got approval for only one year.
more...
gauravsh
02-16 09:15 PM
Hellow,
I have a quick question. My I140 got approved in sep'08. Should I have to wait till PD gets current or I can file for I485 and USCIS will process my application according to my PD?
Any responce will be highly appreciated.
Gaurav
I have a quick question. My I140 got approved in sep'08. Should I have to wait till PD gets current or I can file for I485 and USCIS will process my application according to my PD?
Any responce will be highly appreciated.
Gaurav
hot Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini
chintalapatis
08-14 05:31 PM
I do not see a forum where to post about employers. Please move if this is not the place for this thread to be in.
The following blog post illustrates how desi employers treat when a consultant leave the company. Please do not think that I left without reasons. They threatened me a lot while I was with them.
chintalapatis daily life: DataManUSA (http://murthy-chintalapati.blogspot.com/2009/08/datamanusa.html)
I can be reached at chintalapatis@gmail.com if anybody wants more information about this company.
The following blog post illustrates how desi employers treat when a consultant leave the company. Please do not think that I left without reasons. They threatened me a lot while I was with them.
chintalapatis daily life: DataManUSA (http://murthy-chintalapati.blogspot.com/2009/08/datamanusa.html)
I can be reached at chintalapatis@gmail.com if anybody wants more information about this company.
more...
house Sony-Ericsson-Xperia-X10-Mini-
Joey Foley
June 23rd, 2005, 03:14 PM
I uploaded a few new concert photos I shot last week.
If you get time look around my gallery (or maybe even my website :) )
and let me know what you think?
Thanks
If you get time look around my gallery (or maybe even my website :) )
and let me know what you think?
Thanks
tattoo [WAL] Wallpaper for Xperia
dallasdoc
11-20 09:47 PM
We are among the July filers. TSC applications went to VSC and back to TSC. My wife and I both got our EADs. Social Sceurity office told my wife that her A# is bringing up someone else's data. We went to Infopass, but it was of no help and we were adviced to contact or write to TSC. We placed a service request by calling the national phone number. That was more than two weeks back. Nothing has happened yet. All three applications - 485, EAD, AP has the same wrong A#. Her EAD is of no value without the correct A# that has to be rectified at the 485 stage and then EAD. Any suggestions?
more...
pictures Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini
venk_bala
08-30 07:21 PM
Hi,
My Name is Venkat
I have the following question reg. my wife's status.
1. i applied Green Card in EB3 category, i have my EAD but iam not using it and iam maintaining my H1b for my wife as she is in H4.
2. Meantime my company is processing EB2 for me and is in PERM stage and i have included my wife in the EB2 process.
Suppose if we apply a new H1b visa for my wife and because of the tough situation if that H1b petiton is denied for my wife, will there be any queries or any issues when my wife files I-485/EAD in EB2 . Also will it cause any serious delays or I-485/EAD might get rejected?
Thanks
Venkat
My Name is Venkat
I have the following question reg. my wife's status.
1. i applied Green Card in EB3 category, i have my EAD but iam not using it and iam maintaining my H1b for my wife as she is in H4.
2. Meantime my company is processing EB2 for me and is in PERM stage and i have included my wife in the EB2 process.
Suppose if we apply a new H1b visa for my wife and because of the tough situation if that H1b petiton is denied for my wife, will there be any queries or any issues when my wife files I-485/EAD in EB2 . Also will it cause any serious delays or I-485/EAD might get rejected?
Thanks
Venkat
dresses Sony Ericsson Xperia mini
Macaca
02-17 04:54 PM
Will post something 1.
more...
makeup Sony Ericsson Xperia mini
lovish_21
07-27 03:02 PM
HI,
I have concurrent filed I140 and 485 in Aug 2007. My I 140 is still pending. Can some one let me know what could be the reason. Is there any one whose i140 is pending since last three years.I am worried because processing time is around 4-6 months.Any help in this regard will be appriciated.
Thanks
I have concurrent filed I140 and 485 in Aug 2007. My I 140 is still pending. Can some one let me know what could be the reason. Is there any one whose i140 is pending since last three years.I am worried because processing time is around 4-6 months.Any help in this regard will be appriciated.
Thanks
girlfriend The Xperia X10 mini has a
Humhongekamyab
01-14 11:40 AM
My PD is still another 10 months away but my AP which was approved 2 months back is getting a Soft LUD everyday since the last 4 days. Does it signify anything?
Thanks!
Thanks!
hairstyles XPERIA X10 Mini Pro
yogirajd
11-10 07:28 PM
I am also in same boat. but I havn't filed I-485 yet, and in oct my I-140 got denied.
My EB2 was converted to EB3 while responding to previous query on EB2.
I want to opt only for EB2 cate.
My EB2 was converted to EB3 while responding to previous query on EB2.
I want to opt only for EB2 cate.
Macaca
08-05 07:42 AM
A Polarized, and Polarizing, Congress (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/03/AR2007080301949.html) By David S. Broder (davidbroder@washpost.com), August 5, 2007
The distinguishing characteristic of this Congress was on vivid display the other day when the House debated a bill to expand the federal program that provides health insurance for children of the working poor.
Even when it is performing a useful service, this Congress manages to look ugly and mean-spirited. So much blood has been spilled, so much bile stockpiled on Capitol Hill, that no good deed goes untarnished.
The State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) is a 10-year-old proven success. Originally a product of bipartisan consensus, passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton, it was one of the last domestic achievements before Monica and impeachment fever seized control.
It is up for renewal this year and suddenly has become a bone of contention. President Bush underfunded it in his budget; the $4.8 billion extra he proposed spending in the next five years would not finance insurance even for all those who are currently being served.
But when the Senate Finance Committee proposed boosting the funding to $35 billion -- financed by a hefty hike in tobacco taxes -- Bush threatened a veto, and he raised the rhetorical stakes by claiming that the measure was a step toward "government health insurance."
That was surprising news to Republican Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Orrin Hatch of Utah, two staunch conservatives who had joined in sponsoring the Senate bill, which the Senate Finance Committee supported 17 to 4.
But rather than meet the president's unwise challenge with a strong bipartisan alternative, the House Democratic leadership decided to raise the partisan stakes even higher by bringing out a $50 billion bill that not only would expand SCHIP but would also curtail the private Medicare benefit delivery system that Bush favors.
To add insult to injury, House Democratic leaders then took a leaf from the old Republican playbook and brought the swollen bill to the floor with minimal time for debate and denied Republicans any opportunity to offer amendments.
The result was undisguised fury -- and some really ugly exchanges on the floor. The worst, given voice by former speaker Dennis Hastert, a Republican from Illinois, among others, was the charge that the Democrats were opening the program to illegal immigrants. The National Republican Congressional Committee distributed that distortion wholesale across the country in a flurry of news releases playing to the same kind of nativist prejudice that sank the immigration reform bill. In fact, governors of both parties support the certification system included in the bill for assuring that families meet citizenship requirements; the governors know that too many legal residents have been wrongly disqualified because they could not locate their birth certificates.
In the end, the House bill passed on a near-party-line vote, 225 to 204, far short of the margin that would be needed to override the promised Bush veto. That means the program will probably have to be given a temporary renewal before the Sept. 30 deadline, and eventually Democrats and the White House will negotiate an agreement.
So it will go down as one more example of unnecessary conflict. No rational human being could explain why a program that both parties support and both want to continue could ignite such a fight.
But that is Washington in this era of polarized politics. As Congress heads out for its August recess, it has accomplished about as much as is usually the case at this stage. It passed an overdue increase in the minimum wage and an overdue but healthy package of ethics reforms. It moved some routine legislation.
But what the public has seen and heard is mainly the ugly sound of partisan warfare. The Senate let a handful of dissident Republicans highjack the immigration bill. Its Democratic leadership marched up the hill and back down on repeated futile efforts to circumscribe American involvement in Iraq, then shamefully pulled back from a final vote when a constructive Republican alternative to the Bush policy was on offer.
The less-than-vital issue of the firing of eight U.S. attorneys has occupied more time and attention than the threat of a terrorist enclave in Pakistan -- or the unchecked growth of long-term debts that could sink Medicare and Social Security.
And when this Congress had an opportunity to take a relatively simple, incremental step to extend health insurance to a vulnerable group, the members managed to make a mess of it.
It's no wonder the approval ratings of Congress are so dismal.
The distinguishing characteristic of this Congress was on vivid display the other day when the House debated a bill to expand the federal program that provides health insurance for children of the working poor.
Even when it is performing a useful service, this Congress manages to look ugly and mean-spirited. So much blood has been spilled, so much bile stockpiled on Capitol Hill, that no good deed goes untarnished.
The State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) is a 10-year-old proven success. Originally a product of bipartisan consensus, passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton, it was one of the last domestic achievements before Monica and impeachment fever seized control.
It is up for renewal this year and suddenly has become a bone of contention. President Bush underfunded it in his budget; the $4.8 billion extra he proposed spending in the next five years would not finance insurance even for all those who are currently being served.
But when the Senate Finance Committee proposed boosting the funding to $35 billion -- financed by a hefty hike in tobacco taxes -- Bush threatened a veto, and he raised the rhetorical stakes by claiming that the measure was a step toward "government health insurance."
That was surprising news to Republican Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Orrin Hatch of Utah, two staunch conservatives who had joined in sponsoring the Senate bill, which the Senate Finance Committee supported 17 to 4.
But rather than meet the president's unwise challenge with a strong bipartisan alternative, the House Democratic leadership decided to raise the partisan stakes even higher by bringing out a $50 billion bill that not only would expand SCHIP but would also curtail the private Medicare benefit delivery system that Bush favors.
To add insult to injury, House Democratic leaders then took a leaf from the old Republican playbook and brought the swollen bill to the floor with minimal time for debate and denied Republicans any opportunity to offer amendments.
The result was undisguised fury -- and some really ugly exchanges on the floor. The worst, given voice by former speaker Dennis Hastert, a Republican from Illinois, among others, was the charge that the Democrats were opening the program to illegal immigrants. The National Republican Congressional Committee distributed that distortion wholesale across the country in a flurry of news releases playing to the same kind of nativist prejudice that sank the immigration reform bill. In fact, governors of both parties support the certification system included in the bill for assuring that families meet citizenship requirements; the governors know that too many legal residents have been wrongly disqualified because they could not locate their birth certificates.
In the end, the House bill passed on a near-party-line vote, 225 to 204, far short of the margin that would be needed to override the promised Bush veto. That means the program will probably have to be given a temporary renewal before the Sept. 30 deadline, and eventually Democrats and the White House will negotiate an agreement.
So it will go down as one more example of unnecessary conflict. No rational human being could explain why a program that both parties support and both want to continue could ignite such a fight.
But that is Washington in this era of polarized politics. As Congress heads out for its August recess, it has accomplished about as much as is usually the case at this stage. It passed an overdue increase in the minimum wage and an overdue but healthy package of ethics reforms. It moved some routine legislation.
But what the public has seen and heard is mainly the ugly sound of partisan warfare. The Senate let a handful of dissident Republicans highjack the immigration bill. Its Democratic leadership marched up the hill and back down on repeated futile efforts to circumscribe American involvement in Iraq, then shamefully pulled back from a final vote when a constructive Republican alternative to the Bush policy was on offer.
The less-than-vital issue of the firing of eight U.S. attorneys has occupied more time and attention than the threat of a terrorist enclave in Pakistan -- or the unchecked growth of long-term debts that could sink Medicare and Social Security.
And when this Congress had an opportunity to take a relatively simple, incremental step to extend health insurance to a vulnerable group, the members managed to make a mess of it.
It's no wonder the approval ratings of Congress are so dismal.
srikondoji
09-08 10:12 AM
All along we have worked with MA chapter and now we are making all out efforts and starting a new group for NH members.
Please join this group as soon as you can
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NH_Immigration_Voice/
Best regards
sri
Please join this group as soon as you can
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NH_Immigration_Voice/
Best regards
sri
No comments:
Post a Comment